
So anyway, folks, I'm going to keep this one short tonight, because, honestly, I've been putting a little too much time, energy, and thought into it so far today and I'm ready to put it to bed. (Not to mention I've been going through a great writing jag the last few weeks, and I want to keep up the momentum.)
But the way I figure it, old Bloody Knucks can carry the last of the weight before I move on.
And what, you may ask, is this idiot rambling on about?
Rejection.
It's part of life, I know this, I get this. . .it's especially true in the writing life. Sometimes you just work your ass off on a story or a chapter, whatever, and you think it's the greatest piece of writing you've ever put to paper. In fact, it's better than anything that anyone has ever put to paper. (Okay, maybe that's going a little too far.) But, anyway, you know the story you put down is just the utter shit With a Capital S! So you do your re-write, and it's still just as solid. . .in fact you like it even more, and then you send it out into the world. Maybe to a print mag you read and enjoy on a regular basis, or a zine you read with even greater regularity.
And then you wait. . .
And wait. . .
And finally you get back an e-mail or a SASE with the big let down.
Form rejection letter.
But this, of course, doesn't deter you. Yeah, you're let down, you're a little pissed, but you believe in your Capital S story, so you send it out again.
And wait, thinking this is going to be it, this next editor will see the genius of your story and will rush to publish your polished little gem.
And then, e-mail saying thanks but, no.
So, you research further into the markets, find another place to send it . . . and same freaking cycle.
This is what I've been going through the past few months with a little horror/noir story I wrote back in the middle of December, and I'll be the first one to admit that I really like this piece. I had a blast writing and then re-writing, the whole deal, but apparently, I'm the only one who does. 3 separate zines have kicked the story back to me and I'm really not understanding the reason why?
So, as I sat at my desk at work today, staring dead eyed at the newest rejection letter for my horror/noir piece of solid gold, I remembered a little challenge Elaine Ash
offered up on her blog at the end of February where she would basically take a story that had yet been published or turned down and give it a going over with thee old editorial brush. When I read about it courtesy of Patti Abbott's
blog, I thought to myself, hey, what a cool idea that is! I even went so far as to post a link on Bloody Knucks and commented on it on Elaine's blog, thinking how cool it would be to hand something over to her, but not really having anything for it at the moment. . .that is until today.
Anyway, Elaine wrote me back asking what I had to give her, and I sent her along the story. . .I guess we'll see what she has to say.
Whew! Well, I feel better now, on with the show, folks, and thanks for listening.
PS
I'll keep you posted on what Elaine has to say.
Keep us posted. Very interesting. I ran a critique and editing site for a year and it burned me to a fritter.
ReplyDeleteYou've got a great eye for it though, Chris. One of the most astute I've worked with so far. (Neil Smith does, too, and I hear the Out of the Gutter kids can be just as fine toothed--I imagine I'll be finding that out soon, I just sent one their way.)
ReplyDeleteThe submission/rejection/acceptance process for short stories (and novels) is always going to be a very subjective thing. Reasons why an editor might reject your perfectly good script can boil down to the story not fitting with those accepted for a collection, formatting issues or how many beers they've had the night before. I'm not saying this to be funny, flippant or disrespectful. I'm currently editing an anthology and it's mostly a thankless task and very time-consuming. I can see why many editors go with form rejections. But feedback is vital to writers, wherever they can get it from, so I applaud Elaine Ash for her generosity. You'd have to be a saint.
ReplyDeleteI used to use an online crit site called critters.org. But since my writing started creeping into crime and noir, and it's mostly a site for horror, sf and fantasy writers, I wasn't getting as much from it as I was when I wrote straight horror short stories, so I haven't been active there for quite some time. Still, a lot of what I learned there still applies to my writing (though I had to endure some very misguided advice to find the real pearls of wisdom). My story Hard Rock was the last to go through the critters system. I got some great feedback, but half the people loved it, half hated it. It got rejected a number of times by different horror and crime publications (can't remember how many) until it settled at Thughlit in February. And it actually promted an agent to get in touch with me after he read it there. I hadn't changed it in any significant way after the critiques and rejections. I was pretty sure it was a decent story. It only found a home because I kept knocking on doors. Eventually, somebody took pity on the sick little guy and gave him shelter.
Sorry, bit of a ramble that. Basically I'm saying, trust your own judgement first, but don't ignore advice from others. You'll know deep down when you hear it if it's right, even if it stings a little. After that, persistance is key.
gb
You're not rambling, Gerard. (Okay, kind of, but I get the feeling it's all the cold medicine your on right now.) And I agree with you a hundred percent and usually I let my instincts run with the story (and the overall judgement of the editor.) but if I'm even a little not right with what the editor wants, I'll not make the change. And, yes, you are very right about persistence being the key
ReplyDeleteUm, yeah. PesistEnce.
ReplyDeleteCold medicine. Thank God I'm not driving home from work today.
And apologies if I'm teaching my granny to suck eggs. :)
gb
PeRsistEnce.
ReplyDeleteJaysus.
gb
Good. I have about a dozen stories that can't seem to find a home. Maybe we need an online group to nail the problem.
ReplyDeleteIt might be an idea, Patti? But I don't know if Chris and Gerard have the time between their projects?
ReplyDeleteI await this experience with baited breath. I am fortunate enough to have an editor with one magazine that gives me the best feedback ever, but I only ask her opinion for things that I submit to that particular magazine.
ReplyDelete